We are Not in an AI Apocalypse

This is my final dispatch for the semester, and I’m pleased to offer this concluding observation: We are not (yet) in an AI apocalypse! 

Here’s what I mean by that:

  • The more I use AI, the better I understand the amount of work it takes to transform AI-generated content into a high quality, college-level essay. I am, therefore, less worried about students offloading cognitive labor if and when they integrate AI into their writing process. 

Continue Reading

Peer Review Activity: Feedback Isn’t The Point

A few weeks ago, I experimented with a method for integrating AI into peer review. My goal was to see if AI can be used by students as a tool for evaluating their own writing. When I do peer review, I give students a guide with a series of steps and questions designed to help them dissect their drafts and analyze them via my grading criteria.

Continue Reading

Identifying Unsupported Claims

In my W101, I am using AI-generated writing to teach students two things: (1) the pitfalls of submitting unrefined AI output in their assignments and (2) how to evaluate and revise writing. For example, I developed this group activity to help students learn how to identify unsupported claims.

When prompted to write a college-level essay, AI tends to generate a lot of unsupported claims.

Continue Reading